The 240W charger took 50 minutes to juice the device up to 60 percent with light Chrome use. The M16’s battery is the same size as the G15’s (90Wh) and it has a weaker GPU, so this looks like it’s on Intel.Ĭharging was also a bit slow. The experience wasn’t great either: the game began stuttering around 22 minutes in and became unplayable (with crackling and distorted audio) at 42 minutes in with 20 percent remaining. I only got 57 minutes of Red Dead play out of one charge, where I got an hour and 21 minutes out of the G15.
ASUS PC LINK ANDROID MOST RECENT VERSION DRIVER
Intra-Asus comparisons aside, six hours isn’t a great result for a laptop that’s supposed to be able to double as a primary driver when needed (which is the primary benefit of the 16:10 screen).īattery gaming wasn’t much better. That’s a couple hours shorter than what I averaged on the G15 and only a bit more than what we saw from the Razer Blade 15 Advanced, which has the same GPU but a much smaller battery. The G15 and the G14 both basically never die, but I was averaging just under six and a half hours from using the M16 as my daily work driver with the screen around 200 nits of brightness. Six hours isn’t a great result for a laptop that’s supposed to be able to double as a primary driverīattery life didn’t help the M16’s case. I was fairly clear on Zoom calls, and the noise-canceling microphones did a fine job of picking up my voice as well.
ASUS PC LINK ANDROID MOST RECENT VERSION 720P
The M16’s 720p camera isn’t great, but it’s not terrible, and that’s saying a lot for a laptop webcam. Yes, there is a webcam! Both the G15 and the G14 lack this feature, and I’m really not sure why - while not everyone needs one, it would make both laptops more attractive purchases for anyone like me who’s often on video calls. The M16 has one other feature that’s unique among the recent Zephyrus line: a webcam. It’s a good selection, though I wish the ports were more evenly distributed - seven of the 10 are on the left side. It has a Thunderbolt 4 port in addition to a Type-C, a power port, an Ethernet jack, a headphone jack, an HDMI, and a USB-A port on the left and a microSD slot, a lock slot, and a USB-A on the right. The M16 also has a slight advantage as an Intel system in that it can support Thunderbolt 4. Where the G15 has a large and visible chin, the M16 just has more screen Games and images were gorgeous to look at, with sharp colors and details, and the matte texture eliminates all glare even at low levels of brightness. It’s significantly brighter than the G15’s screen, and the difference does show. It’s bright, maxing out at 444 nits, and vivid, covering 100 percent of the sRGB gamut, 86 percent of Adobe RGB, and 98 percent of P3. Vertical space aside, though, the screen is also phenomenal. The bottom bezel (at least, the part that’s visible) is borderline nonexistent and gives you a noticeable amount of extra room when scrolling a web page or reading a document. Put this next to the G15, and the main difference you’ll notice is that where the G15 has a large and visible chin, the M16 just has more screen. If you’re looking for a QHD 165Hz display with a 16:10 aspect ratio (which allows Asus to cram a 16-incher into a chassis that’s not much bigger than most 15-inch gaming laptops), the Zephyrus M16 is one of few places you’ll find it.
What does the extra money get you? It’s mostly the screen.
So the Intel-based M16 is already fighting an uphill battle when it comes to value. Bigger battery, bigger charger, better screen, and better chips than the previous Zephyrus M15.
0 kommentar(er)
